Legal Opinion
In Re the Welfare of G. S. J.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 13, 1979No. 49236PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
The petition, involving G. S. J., a juvenile, alleging aggravated robbery, was found to be true. At the dispositional hearing, the probation officer submitted a report and an oral statement. Counsel for the juvenile requested the right to cross-examine the probation officer, which was refused. The district court affirmed the juvenile court’s proceedings and sentence. The juvenile claims that his statutory and constitutional rights of cross-examination were violated. We affirm.
*513G. S. J. participated in an aggravated robbery with two other individuals. At the time of the robbery,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gardner v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Lavoy Rexford Orner v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Gary Woody, United States of America v. Blanchard L. SavantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Frank Antonio Pavao v. Harold J. Cardwell, Warden, Arizona State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Welfare of G. S. J.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979