Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mika

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1980No. 1242PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The appeal in this case is from the denial of Appellant’s request for relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act (“PCHA”). 1 The Appellant sought the right to appeal nunc pro tunc, arguing that he had been the effective assistance to counsel, and that his rights to appeal had been obstructed by State officials.

The record shows that in September, 1975, the Appellant was convicted of four counts of arson following a trial before a jury. He was represented by privately retained trial counsel, who filed timely post-trial motions. Following the denial of such motions, the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MabieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  2. Commonwealth v. BrittinghamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Harbold v. MyersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Commonwealth ex rel. Edowski v. MaroneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  5. Commonwealth v. WallaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. StokesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. HarperSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Commonwealth v. EdringtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. DoschSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API