Carson v. Hosiery Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 113, Oct. T., 1900, by plaintiff, in suit of Jobn W. B. Carson against West Branch Hosiery Company, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland County, Sept. T., 1897, No. 478, on verdict for defendant. Opinion by W. D. Porter, J. Assumpsit.
Read the full summary
Appeal, No. 113, Oct. T., 1900, by plaintiff, in suit of Jobn W. B. Carson against West Branch Hosiery Company, from judgment of C. P. Northumberland County, Sept. T., 1897, No. 478, on verdict for defendant. Opinion by W. D. Porter, J. Assumpsit. Before Savidge, P. J. It appears from the record that plaintiff was employed by defendant company as salesman under a contract in writing, and was discharged from his employment before the expiration of the term agreed upon, and subsequently brought this action for 1625. It appears from the evidence that the contract, which was in the form of a…
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
W. D. Pokteb, J.,
The plaintiff was employed by the defendant company as a salesman under a contract in writing, was discharged from said employment before the expiration of the term agreed upon, and subsequently brought this action. He does not print his Statement, and we are unable to determine from the record as *479presented in the paper-book whether he seeks to recover certain instalments of his salary becoming due after his discharge, or the entire damage arising from an alleged improper discharge from his employment. When the court below gives binding instructions against a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matthews v. Park Bros., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1892
- Matthews v. Park Bro. & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1894
- Gallagher v. Wayne Steam Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1898
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lightcap v. KeaggySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Miller v. RoddSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- O'Neil v. SchnellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916