Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Bendheim

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action by the Metropolitan Life Insurance Company against Bendheim and others. Motion by referee for additional compensation.

1Opinion of the CourtBischoff, J.

The motion by the referee for additional compensation for services rendered by Mm as. referee to sell under a judgment of foreclosure and sale cannot be granted. The application is founded solely upon the fact that the property was sold for a sum excessive of $10,000, but the operation of section 3297 of the Code of Civil Procedure, providing for extra compensation in such cases, is to be extended only to a case where the referee has actually received more than $10,000 in cash upon the sale. Hosmer v. Gans, 14 Misc. Rep. 229, 32 N. Y. Supp. 471. Here the greater part of the purchase money was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hosmer v. GanoNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1895
  2. Granz v. LichtenheinNew York Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Osborn v. DeGraaf Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  2. Dime Sav. Bank v. PettitNew York Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API