Legal Opinion

Earlboro Tp. v. Howard

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided May 18, 1915No. 6942PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from District Court, Pottawatomie County; Chas. B. Wilson, Jr., Judge. Action by Earlboro Township, a municipal corporation, and others, against R. L. Howard and others, Board of County Commissioners of Pottawatomie County, and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

This cause is here on error from the district court of Pottawatomie county. The petition was filed by Earlboro and Forest townships, municipal townships in said county, and one Carrall and another, Rippy, resident taxpayers of said townships respectively, against the board of county commissioners,, the clerk, the treasurer, and the county assessor of that county. The object of the suit was to prevent the attempted organization of Rock Creek township out of portions of Earlboro, Forest, and Davis townships, and to question its legal existence. The prayer of the amended petition in effect was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State Ex Rel. Standeven v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Attorney General v. City of MethuenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1921
  2. Griffin v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Board of Regents v. McCloskey Brothers, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
  4. Fowler, Co. Supt. v. ParkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Harvey v. KirtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API