Morley v. Guild
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Bane County. The case is stated in the opinion of the court. as td the insufficiency of the verification of the complaints, cited 11 How. Pr. R., 374; 12 id., 64; 14 id., 334. , as to the sufficiency of the verification, cited Gillett vs. Houghton and Mills vs. Hough-ton, 8 Wis., 311; Bates vs. Pike, 9 id., ¡224; 1 Whittaker, 333; 2 id., 407; Latson vs. Lefever, 5 Sandf., 650; Hixwell vs. Wordsworth, 2 Code Rep., 1. *
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court,
Dixon, C. J.
The facts of these two cases, so far as they are connected with any disputed questions of law, are precisely the same, and both were treated as one cause at the argument. They present two questions of practice for our determination. The first relates to the time within which a defendant in a foreclosure action, against whom no personal claim is made, may be permitted to answer, under the operation of sec. 5 of chap. 124 of the Revised Statutes, and sec. 1 of chap. 220 of the Laws of 1859, in a case where he is served with a summons and a notice of no personal claim,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Kinkaid v. Kipp & BrownThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
- Gillett v. HoughtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
3Cited by10 opinions
- Frisk v. ReigelmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Potwin v. BlasherWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- Crane v. WileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
- Knowles v. FritzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- Market National Bank of New York v. HoganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.