Legal Opinion

CITY OF EVANSVILLE v. Lehman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 14, 1965No. 20,252Published

1Opinion

On Petition for Rehearing

Mote, J.

Each appellant herein has filed a petition for rehearing.

Appellant, Whirlpool Corporation, has not submitted a brief in support of its petition but has presented arguments therein designed to support its contentions.

Appellant, City of Evansville’s petition for rehearing also contains arguments therein designed to support its said contentions and said appellant has also submitted an argumentative brief.

By petition, appellee seeks dismissal of the said petition because of asserted lack of compliance with Rule 2-22 of the Supreme Court of Indiana, adopted for our…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Automobile Underwriters, Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Guthrie v. BLAKELYIndiana Court of Appeals · 1955
  3. MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. ETC. v. WeissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1959
  4. CITY OF EVANSVILLE v. LehmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API