State v. Virgi
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By HURD, PJ.
The sole question now before this court for'consideration is whether the court of common pleas erred prejudicially in denying the defendants appellants permission on motion to withdraw pleas of ‘guilty’ previously entered and to proceed to trial on pleas of ‘not1 guilty’ as prayed for.
The record shows that both "defendants were indicted jointly on several counts in one indictment, and that the defendant, Dottore, was also indicted separately, — both indictments charging the crime of larceny by trick. On arraignment the defendants pleaded ‘not guilty’ but on December 19,…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Sinclair v. SinclairOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
- State v. MatthesOhio Court of Appeals · 1961