Legal Opinion

State v. Virgi

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 3, 1948No. Nos. 21032 and 21033PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By HURD, PJ.

The sole question now before this court for'consideration is whether the court of common pleas erred prejudicially in denying the defendants appellants permission on motion to withdraw pleas of ‘guilty’ previously entered and to proceed to trial on pleas of ‘not1 guilty’ as prayed for.

The record shows that both "defendants were indicted jointly on several counts in one indictment, and that the defendant, Dottore, was also indicted separately, — both indictments charging the crime of larceny by trick. On arraignment the defendants pleaded ‘not guilty’ but on December 19,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sinclair v. SinclairOhio Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. State v. MatthesOhio Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API