Legal Opinion

Messick v. Mumma

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 15, 1960No. Appeal, No. 9PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Montgomery, J.,

Appellant is the owner of a farm in Dauphin County which was operated in her father’s name until about the time of his death in June of 1948. He received his feed and supplies from appellee on an open account in his name but, due to his illness, on or about September 24, 1947, the account was transferred to the name of *641appellant. Thereafter, she made 141 purchases which were charged and 53 payments which were credited. As of April 12, 1952, the account showed a balance of $3,112.04 owing by appellant. On her failure to pay, suit was entered in the Dauphin County…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Renard Linoleum & Rug Co. v. PriceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Bank & Trust Co. v. Coudriet, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Elk County1964
  2. Harry Cramer, Inc. v. Morris, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1965
  3. Universal Mortgage Service Co. v. Hegarty, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Chester County1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API