Legal Opinion

Neal v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 25, 1978No. 38865PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McMILLIAN, Judge.

Appellant Samuel Lee Neal appeals from a judgment of the circuit court of the City of St. Louis denying, after an evidentiary hearing, his second Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. motion to set aside his conviction and sentence. For reversal appellant argues that the trial court erred in dismissing appellant’s second Rule 27.26 motion for lack of jurisdiction because (1) appellant was denied effective assistance of counsel in his first Rule 27.26 motion, which was denied after an evidentiary hearing, and (2) appellant’s counsel failed to appeal the denial of the first Rule 27.26 motion.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. NealMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Williams v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. McCormick v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  4. Crosswhite v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  5. Duley v. LeiningerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brauch v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Adail v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. Burnside v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Davis v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Brown v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API