Legal Opinion
Stern v. University of Oklahoma Board of Regents
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided November 3, 1992No. 78690PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
HANSEN, Vice-Chief Judge:
Appellants, “University”, seek review of the trial court’s order which sustained Ap-pellee Stern’s motion for summary judgment. Stern brought this action for breach of contract and violation of due process when the University declined to offer Stern a tenured teaching position at the University of Oklahoma. For the reasons herein discussed, we must reverse the trial court’s order.
Stern was appointed as a probationary professor in the Department of Philosophy at O.U. in 1984. Both parties agree Stern’s appointment was subject to the provisions of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Julia Prewitt Brown v. Trustees of Boston UniversityCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Robert E. Beitzell v. William H. Jeffrey, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wright v. Howard UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- University of Baltimore v. IzCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
- Kumbhojkar v. University of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Stern v. UNIV. OF OKL. BD. OF REGENTSCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1992