Routh v. Thorpe
Supreme Court of Arkansas
App.eal from Madison Circuit Court; J. S. Maples, Judge; The judgment should be affirmed because there is no evidence that the bill of exceptions was filed with the clerk within the time allowed by the trial court. 42 Ark. 488; 35 Ark. 396; Id. 386; 39 Ark. 558; 53 Ark. 415; 58 Ark. 110; Kirby’s Dig., § 6225.
1Opinion of the Court
Frauenthal,- J.
This is an action instituted by Henry Thorpe against E. A. Routh to recover damages for fraud and deceit. It was alleged that the defendant, by the false and fraudulent representations of his duly authorized agent, had induced the plaintiff to purchase a tract of land owned by him, and it was sought to recover the damages which the plaintiff had thereby sustained. To this complaint the defendant duly filed his answer, and the case was thereupon tried by a jury upon the issues thus joined, resulting in a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The defendant has prosecuted this…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stinson v. ShaferSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Roberts & Scheffer Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1907
- Watson v. WatsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1890
- State v. VandimarkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- Walker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Engles v. Oklahoma Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Petroleum Producers Ass'n v. First National BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924
- Ward v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Furst Thomas v. VarnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.