Woodline, Inc. v. Little Darling Furniture, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWalsh, J.
Defendant moves to remove this action from the Municipal Court to this court on the ground that the Municipal Court does not have jurisdiction of defendant’s counterclaim for $10,000. Plaintiff’s complaint is for goods sold and delivered. Defendant’s counterclaim is for breach of contract. The applicable part of subdivision 1 of section 110-a of the Civil Practice Act reads as follows: “ Whenever in an action or special proceeding it shall appear * * * that the dam-
ages sustained are greater in amount than originally alleged, claimed or prayed for in any pleading and the court in which such…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. McGuire & Co.New York Supreme Court · 1937
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weinick v. I. G. S. Pants Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947
- L. Mitchell & Co. v. AllmanNew York Supreme Court · 1959