Melton v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Sognier, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of driving under the influence of alcohol.
1. Appellant contends the trial court abused its discretion by denying his motion for a continuance, as the denial of this motion severely prejudiced his defense. Appellant’s counsel was called for jury duty during the week of appellant’s trial. When appellant’s case was called for trial his attorney moved for a continuance on the ground that he was on jury duty.
At a hearing on the motion counsel did not contend he was unprepared for trial or had had insufficient time to prepare for trial because of jury duty.…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
- Lester v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- McCann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- Bunge v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hogan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Morrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
- Allen v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
- In re K. H.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
- Collier v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.