Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Kelsay Lumber Co.
Texas Commission of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.
We have been convinced by the argument presented in the surety company’s motion for rehearing that defendant in error Rotsky was not entitled to recover judgment against it for the amount recovered against him by defendant in error Kelsay Lumber Company.
The jury found that an agreement was made between the Kelsay Lumber Company, the materialman, Rotsky, the owner, and Helm, the contracto!, whereby it was agreed the owner would hold back a sufficient sum of the contract price and pay the same direct to the.lumber company, upon completion of the building, for the material furnished by it. It is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hess & Skinner Engineering Co. v. TurneyTexas Supreme Court · 1919
- U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Henderson CountyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
- Lane & Saylor v. Scott & CulverTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Finney v. CondonIllinois Supreme Court · 1877
- Durrell v. FarwellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Park Presbyterian Church of Italy v. William Cameron & Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
- Spin-Line Company v. United Concrete Pipe Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- American Employers Insurance v. HuddlestonTexas Supreme Court · 1934
- Friendswood Independent School District v. National Surety Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- Dauley v. First National Bank of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978