Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Bennett Bigman
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1970No. 25346PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Per curiam
Appellant was convicted of failing to register with the Selective Service System in violation of 50 U.S.C. App. § 462. We affirm.
Appellant contends that the trial court erred in admitting certain statements made by him to FBI agents prior and subsequent to his arrest because the agents did not advise him of his rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), before questioning him. The government responds that appellant was not “in custody” when interviewed prior to his arrest, and had already been adequately warned before the post-arrest questioning. We…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Bolling v. SharpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Holliday v. Ketchum, MacLeod & Grove, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- Michael Alexander v. Trustees of Boston University, Michael Alexander v. Trustees of Boston University, Selective Service SystemCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- United States v. John Dabney Collier WalkerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1972
- McGinnis v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1980
- United States v. Dennis Ray KoehnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.