Legal Opinion
Jerald L. Kendrick, James Peters, John R. Vaughn, Darrell Scott and Michael Friend v. David H. Bland
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 18, 1991No. 89-6548, 89-6549, 89-6571 and 89-6572PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs appeal the District Court’s order denying a motion to hold defendants in contempt for failing to comply with a consent decree issued in Kendrick v. Bland, 541 F.Supp. 21 (W.D.Ky.1981). For the following reasons, the District Court’s denial is AFFIRMED in part and REVERSED in part, and REMANDED to the District Court.
Appellants, James Peters, John R. Vaughn, Darrell Scott and Michael Friend, are inmates at the Kentucky State Reformatory at LaGrange, Kentucky (KSR). This suit arises out of a consent decree entered into by the Commonwealth of Kentucky and a class…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jerald Kendrick, Cross-Appellants v. David Bland, Cross-Appellees, United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Kendrick v. BlandDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1981
3Cited by27 opinions
- United States v. Jonathan Jay PollardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1992
- Home Port Rentals, Inc. v. RubenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
- Harrison v. Metropolitan Government Of Nashville And Davidson CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. Dow Corning Corp. (In Re Dow Corning Corp.)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Kevin Simms v. Bayer Healthcare, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.