Legal Opinion

Leggett & Platt Spring Bed Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided September 12, 1927No. Docket Nos. 4343, 13112Published

1. On the evidence, held that the actual cash value of patent at the date paid in for stock has not been established. 2. On the evidence, held that the March 1, 1913, value of the patent has not been established. 3. Adjustment of invested capital on account of additional income and profits taxes for prior years approved.

1Opinion of the Court

LEGGETT & PLATT SPRING BED MANUFACTURING CO., PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Leggett & Platt Spring Bed Mfg. Co. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 4343, 13112.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

8 B.T.A. 61; 1927 BTA LEXIS 2961;

September 12, 1927, Promulgated

1. On the evidence, held that the actual cash value of patent at the date paid in for stock has not been established.

2. On the evidence, held that the March 1, 1913, value of the patent has not been established.

3. Adjustment of invested capital on account of additional income and profits taxes for prior years approved.

M…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Russel Wheel & Foundry Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  2. Wallis Tractor Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  3. Manville Jenckes Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926
  4. Cheatham Electric Switching Device Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1925
  5. Appeal of B. F. Boyer Co.United States Board of Tax Appeals · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API