Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Berkowitz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided January 26, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

In this accounting proceeding distribution of the estate awaits determination of the identity of the person entitled to take the one-third of the residuaiy willed to Harry Berkowitz. The latter has made assignments of his interests. He has suffered judgments to be taken against him under which a receiver in supplementary proceedings has been appointed and is acting. In addition he is defendant in a divorce action pending in New York county wherein a sequestration receiver has been appointed. Attack is made upon the assignments by the receiver in sequestration. None is made upon…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McCorkle v. . HerrmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Rosenberg v. RosenbergNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Foster v. . TownshendNew York Court of Appeals · 1877
  4. Scott v. ScottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  5. In re SpiesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tuitt v. TuittNew York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Rennebaum v. RennebaumNew York Supreme Court · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API