Legal Opinion

Tunstall v. Warden, Madison Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 17, 2025No. 1:22-cv-00280Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION KAMERON TUNSTALL, Case No. 1:22-CV-280 Petitioner, Judge Michael R. Barrett v. WARDEN, MADISON CORRECTIONAL OPINION & ORDER INSTITUTION, Respondent. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) and Supplemental R&R of the Magistrate Judge. (Docs. 19, 22). Petitioner Kameron Tunstall has timely objected to both. (Docs. 20, 23). For the following reasons, the Court will adopt the reasoning of the Magistrate Judge and deny the petition with prejudice. I. BACKGROUND In 2018, a Butler County grand…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Estelle v. McGuireSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. O'Sullivan v. BoerckelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API