Legal Opinion
Backman v. Guiliano
Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division
Decided September 28, 1953No. 4660Published
1Opinion of the Court
Gadsby, P. /.
This is an action of tort for unlawful interference with contract. The defendant filed an answer of general denial and an allegation of payment.
After hearing the parties and their witnesses the trial judge made the following findings:
“This is an action of tort for unlawful interference with contract wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover damages on the alleged conduct of the defendant in failing to reveal to a third party that, the plaintiff, a *25real estate broker, solicited the defendant to buy the property of said third party.
From all the evidence I am satisfied, and I so find,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Barton v. City of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1945
- Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Ross v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1934
- Gleason v. NelsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1894
- Sherman v. Briggs Realty Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.