Legal Opinion

Heyman v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 15, 1923No. 3592PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PECK, District Judge.

Two questions are involved in this case. The first is to whom the 50-gallon exemption from the so-called “floor tax” on distilled spirits, provided by section 303 of the War Revenue Act of October 3, 1917 (Comp. St. 1918, § 5986b), applied, when the liquor was held on June 1, 1917, by trustees in bankruptcy, who later sold it at retail. The second is whether the bankrupt’s trustees, who so sold it without requiring the floor tax to be paid by the purchasers at the time of sale, and who have received from them what was-intended to be the full tax-free price, and now hold…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  2. Bank of Commerce v. Tennessee Ex Rel. MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  3. Tucker v. FergusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  4. In re RochfordCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1903
  5. J. W. Perry Co. v. City of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1911

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Van Huffel v. HarkelrodeSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Black Motor Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  3. McColgan v. Maier Brewing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  4. In Re West Coast Cabinet Works, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 1950
  5. Masonic Country Club of Western Michigan v. HoldenDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API