Legal Opinion

McCabe v. Gelfand

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 4, 1968PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCarmine A. Ventiera, J.

Motion by the plaintiff for an

order dismissing the separate, distinct and complete defenses contained in paragraphs “ 7 ” through “ 9 ” inclusive of the second amended answer upon the ground that a defense is not stated therein. More specifically, the defendants have interposed the Statute of Limitations as a defense to the allegations contained in the second amended complaint.

The facts as alleged, in brief, are as follows:

In an action commenced on March 25, 1958, the plaintiff, judgment creditor, sued the defendant, judgment debtor, Sam Gelfand, among others, for personal injuries, claiming…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pearl v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  2. Ernest Klein v. Shields & Company and Warner G. Cosgrove, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Schmidt v. McKayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  4. Pearl v. The City Of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  5. Hoff Research & Development Laboratories, Inc. v. Philippine National Bank and Philippine National Bank, New York AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1970

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API