State v. Handspike
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
The state offers two theories, concededly contradictory, to uphold the validity of this search and seizure: one, that the search and seizure is valid under the Terry v. Ohio "stop and frisk” rationale; two, that the appellee was under lawful arrest and the search and seizure was a valid incident thereof.
1. The facts of this case justify the officer’s approach of a car, dangerously parked at night on a one-way street marked with "No Parking” signs. The policeman’s testimony was that his initial interest in the vehicle was its location rather than the activity which might…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Shy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1975
- Anderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Holtzendorf v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Radowick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
- Dunn v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Meeks v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- State v. HandspikeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1977
- Radowick v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.