Legal Opinion

McKenzie-Wharton v. United Airlines, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided February 1, 2016No. Case No: 8:15-cv-114-T-17MAPPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPAINT

ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This cause came before the Court on Plaintiffs Lou Berth McKenzie-Wharton and Richard G. Wharton’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and for Remand (Doc. 13), Defendant United Airlines, Inc.’s, (“United”) Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. 30), and Plaintiffs’ Reply In Support of the *1301Motion (Doc. 33). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and for Remand is DENIED. .

I. Background

Plaintiffs filed a complaint…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Bamm, Inc. v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  3. Smith v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002
  4. Espat v. EspatDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API