McKenzie-Wharton v. United Airlines, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Florida
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO AMEND COMPAINT
ELIZABETH A. KOVACHEVICH, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This cause came before the Court on Plaintiffs Lou Berth McKenzie-Wharton and Richard G. Wharton’s (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and for Remand (Doc. 13), Defendant United Airlines, Inc.’s, (“United”) Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion (Doc. 30), and Plaintiffs’ Reply In Support of the *1301Motion (Doc. 33). For the reasons that follow, Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to Amend Complaint and for Remand is DENIED. .
I. Background
Plaintiffs filed a complaint…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Bamm, Inc. v. Gaf CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Smith v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 2002
- Espat v. EspatDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1999