Legal Opinion

City of Girard v. Youngstown Belt Railway Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 16, 2011No. 2010-T-0079PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cynthia Westcott Rice, Judge.

{¶ 1} Appellant, the city of Girard, appeals from the judgment of the Trumbull County Court of Common Pleas granting the motion of Youngstown Belt Railway Company et al. (“YBR”), appellees, for summary judgment based upon YBR’s assertion that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider Girard’s appropriation complaint because the action was preempted by federal law. At issue is whether the trial court erred in finding that Girard’s appropriation action was preempted by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act (“ICCTA”), Section 10101 et seq., Title…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Wyeth v. LevineSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Altria Group, Inc. v. GoodSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
  4. Kelo v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Retail Clerks International Ass'n, Local 1625 v. SchermerhornSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Girard v. Youngstown Belt Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API