Legal Opinion
Gold Star Co., Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of International Trade
Decided July 29, 1988No. Court 86-11-01438, 86-12-01636, 86-11-01448 and 87-01-00021PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TSOUCALAS, Judge.
This consolidated action is before the Court on plaintiffs’ (Gold Star Co. Ltd., et al., and Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al.) (hereinafter “Gold Star” and “Samsung” respectively) motion for summary judgment on the administrative record pursuant to Rule 56.1 of the Rules of this Court. Plaintiffs challenge the legality of the Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration’s (“ITA” or “Commerce”) scope clarification ruling. Public Record Documents 13, 15 (hereinafter “P.R. Doc.__”). The ruling included separately imported color picture tubes (“CPTs”)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. The United States and Zenith Radio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Diversified Products Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1983
- Royal Business MacHines, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1980
- Royal Business Machines, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Tianjin MacHinery Import & Export Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1992
- Mitsubishi Electric Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
- NTN Bearing Corp. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- Torrington Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
- N.A.R., S.P.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1990
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.