In re James J.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Family Court properly denied respondent’s motion to suppress statements and physical evidence. Under Family Court Act § 718, the officers were authorized to stop and question respondent in view of his youthful appearance, seeming confusion about where he was headed, and presence alone in the Port Authority Bus Terminal, a location that has been described as the " 'national center for runaway children’ ” and "notorious for its high incidence of criminal activity by armed juvenile runaways” (Matter of Mark Anthony G., 169 AD2d 89, 92). Certainly, when the officers in short order ascertained…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re Mark Anthony G.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Michael J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996