Tanner v. Grant
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Case 30 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL EROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, chap. 36, art. 2, sec. 3. Civil Code, sec. 319. 2 J. J. Marsh. 481, Sanders’s adm’r v. Buck, &c.
Read the full summary
Case 30 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL EROM CLARK CIRCUIT COURT. CITED Revised Statutes, chap. 36, art. 2, sec. 3. Civil Code, sec. 319. 2 J. J. Marsh. 481, Sanders’s adm’r v. Buck, &c. CITED Hardin, 518, Blackburn v. Bilbo, &c. 4 B. Mon. .305, Miller v, .Commonwealth. 8 Bush, 132, Commonwealth v. Merrigan. 1 Mon. 90, Crutchers v. Wolf. 1 Mon. 249, Justices of Mason County v. Lee. 5 Mon. 404, Stevens v. Wallace. 1 B. Mon. 239, Williamson v. Logan. 2 B. Mon. 304, Kouns v. Bank of Kentucky. 1 Duvall, Thornton v. McGrath.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Peters
This suit in equity was brought by appellant to enjoin appellee from suing out an execution on a replevin-bond executed by appellant and his surety to appellee.
It is alleged in the petition that appellee recovered a joint *363judgment in the Clark Circuit Court against appellant and James Rainey, and that he caused an execution to issue thereon against appellant alone, directed to the sheriff of the county of Fayette, and while it was in the hands of the sheriff aforesaid appellant replevied the same; that Rainey, the other defendant against whom the judgment was recovex-ed, was living whexx said…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Sibley v. KrauskopfSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Letton's Admr. v. RaffertyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
- Hatfield v. Kentland Coal & Coke Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Wright v. NostrandThe Superior Court of New York City · 1881