Twyman v. General Distributors, Inc.
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
Motion of the appellee, Schuster Express, Inc., to dismiss the defendant’s appeal is granted. This case is not ripe for appeal because the litigation involved multiple claims and there has been no compliance with the provisions of Super. R. Civ. P. 54(b). See Kolc v. Maratta, 113 R. I. 160, 319 A.2d 14 (1974); Menzies v. Sigma Pi Alumni Ass’n, 110 R. I. 488, 294 A.2d 193 (1972). Accordingly, the case is remanded for entry of a proper judgment in the discretion of the court below. Thereafter, the defendant may file its appeal and the case shall then be returned to Supreme Court if there has…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Menzies v. Sigma Pi Alumni Ass'n of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
- Kolc v. MarattaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974