Legal Opinion

Twyman v. General Distributors, Inc.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided September 12, 1975No. Appeal No. 75-210Published

1Opinion of the Court

Motion of the appellee, Schuster Express, Inc., to dismiss the defendant’s appeal is granted. This case is not ripe for appeal because the litigation involved multiple claims and there has been no compliance with the provisions of Super. R. Civ. P. 54(b). See Kolc v. Maratta, 113 R. I. 160, 319 A.2d 14 (1974); Menzies v. Sigma Pi Alumni Ass’n, 110 R. I. 488, 294 A.2d 193 (1972). Accordingly, the case is remanded for entry of a proper judgment in the discretion of the court below. Thereafter, the defendant may file its appeal and the case shall then be returned to Supreme Court if there has…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Menzies v. Sigma Pi Alumni Ass'n of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1972
  2. Kolc v. MarattaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API