Rohl v. State

Upon this review the defendant contends :(1) The conviction cannot stand upon the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice particularly where, as here, the accomplice recanted her testimony.(2) The evidence is not sufficient to support the conviction.(3) The trial court abused its discretion in not granting the motion for a change of venue based upon community prejudice.(4) A new trial should be granted in the interest of justice.

The state public defender, on behalf of the defendant, acknowledges that the rule in this state is that a jury can convict upon the uncorroborated testimony of an…