Legal Opinion

Ives v. McHard

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1882PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the Second District ;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Mercer county; the Hon. John J. Glenn, Judge, presiding. This was an action on a guaranty of the payment of a promissory note.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Walker

The facts being found by the Appellate Court, we are precluded from their consideration further than to determine whether the law has been properly applied to them. It is claimed that there was a material variance between the averments in the declaration and the evidence. It is insisted that there were three things averred as a consideration upon which appellant guaranteed the payment of the note: First, that time of payment was extended on the Dennison note; second, an extension on the Ives and Dennison note; and that only legal interest should be collected on the Ives and Dennison note. On…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Stoebner v. Ritchie Capital Management, L.L.C. (In re Polaroid Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 2012
  2. Commercial State Bank v. FolkertsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  3. First National Bank of Ogden v. TaylorUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  4. People ex rel. Oglevee v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API