Legal Opinion

Jordan v. SAIF Corp.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 16, 2005No. 00-0051M; A116152PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEITS, J., pro tempore

Claimant seeks review of an own motion order of the Workers’ Compensation Board authorizing a suspension of claimant’s temporary total disability benefits for a three-month period during which claimant allegedly failed to attend a medical examination or participate in prescribed physical therapy. Claimant contends that the board lacked authority to suspend his benefits. We affirm.

In 1986, claimant injured both knees while working for his former employer. The claim was closed in 1987, and claimant’s aggravation rights expired on May 21, 1992. In February 2000, at…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Chebot v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Holmes v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Buell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Verban v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jordan v. SAIF Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In the Matter of JordanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API