Legal Opinion

State v. Moss

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2012No. CC 08CR0445; CA A141464; SC S058860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*47LANDAU, J.

Oregon’s fugitive dismissal rule, ORAP 8.05(3), provides that, when a criminal defendant has absconded during the pendency of an appeal, an appellate court may dismiss the appeal, as long as the defendant “has not surrendered” at the time of the dismissal. In this case, defendant filed a notice of appeal and then absconded. The state moved to dismiss. In the meantime, defendant was arrested and returned to custody. On the basis of his return to custody, defendant opposed the motion to dismiss, arguing that he had “surrendered.” The state responded that the mere fact that an…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Molinaro v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Degen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Ortega-Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Estelle v. DorroughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wright v. TurnerOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Sills v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 2022
  3. State v. LazaridesOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  4. State v. BeebeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. LazaridesOregon Supreme Court · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API