Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ladd

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 6, 1957PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Joseph A. Cox, S.

The principal question in this accounting proceeding is the extent of the gift under paragraph ninth of the will, which reads: “ I give and bequeath to Mr. Johannes Schiefer all moneys left over after payment of my debts and funeral expenses.” No difficulty is encountered in applying this provision to cash deposited in banks. (Mann v. Executors of Mann, 1 Johns. Ch. 231, 237, affd. sub nom. Mann v. Mann, 14 Johns. 1; Matter of Feist, 170 Misc. 497, 501; Matter of McKendrie, 150 Misc. 665, 668; Matter of Storm, 205 Misc. 1109, 1112.) Nor is there any difficulty in extending it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mann v. MannNew York Court of Chancery · 1814
  2. Mann v. MannCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 1816
  3. In re the Estate of FeistNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  4. In re the Estate of McKendrieNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934
  5. In re the Will of HindsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of AlexanderNew York Surrogate's Court · 1959
  2. In re the Estate of MatzNew York Surrogate's Court · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API