Legal Opinion
Dickson v. Navarro County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 3
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided January 26, 1939No. 2048PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALEXANDER, Justice.
This suit was brought by Navarro County Levee Improvement District No. 3 upon the relation of E. K. Atwood, an alleged bond holder of the District, against J. M. Dickson and others to recover for certain taxes alleged to be due the District and to foreclose a lien on the land upon which the taxes accrued. Judgment was for plaintiff and the defendants appealed.
Appellants’ major proposition is that E. K. Atwood had no right to maintain the suit in the name of the Levee Improvement District, and for this reason it should have been dismissed. The material facts are these:…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Phil. H. Pierce Co. v. WatkinsTexas Supreme Court · 1924
- Holliday v. HollidayTexas Supreme Court · 1889
- Lawther Grain Co. v. WinnifordTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Vance v. RankinIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
- Taylor v. StrayerIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Dickson v. Navarro County Levee Improvement District No. 3Texas Supreme Court · 1940
- Dickson v. Ellis County Levee Improvement District No. 10Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939