Legal Opinion
Schaick v. Astor
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided February 1, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFrankenthaler, J.
Plaintiff, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, as conservator of the property and assets of the Union Indemnity Company, a foreign corporation, under order of the Supreme Court dated January 9, 1933, sues to recover insurance premiums on two policies issued by the company to the defendant. The answer sets up several defenses and counterclaims founded on demands against the company, and asks for judgment dismissing the complaint and for the sum of said counterclaims.
Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment was based on the ground that defendant was not entitled to offset the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Matter of Empire State Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. PinkstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Holbrook v. Receivers of the American Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Chancery · 1836
- People v. Commercial Alliance Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Skandia America Reinsurance Corp. v. SchenckDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1977
- Van Schaick v. AstorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935