Akers v. City of Miami Beach
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Per curiam
As appellee properly concedes, the trial court erred in ruling that the City of Miami Beach was entitled to summary judgment based on the immunity provided by section 440.11, Florida Statutes (1995). Ramos v. Univision Holdings, Inc., 655 So.2d 89 (Fla.1995). Appellee would have us affirm the summary judgment nevertheless on the alternative ground that there is insufficient evidence to support a finding of negligence on the part of the City. Because the trial court based its judgment solely on the workers’ compensation immunity and this court should not ordinarily decide issues not ruled on…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McGurn v. ScottSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Ramos v. Univision Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1995
3Cited by10 opinions
- Stark v. State Farm Florida Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Metropcs Communications v. Jorge PorterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- Milan Investment Group, Inc. v. City of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- HJC CORP. v. IRINA GALLARDO, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- Incident365 Florida, LLC v. Ocean Pointe v. Condominium Association, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2024
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.