Legal Opinion · Dissent

Deschler v. Fireman's Fund American Life Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1983No. 18035Published

1DissentHowe, Justice

I respectfully dissent.

The majority holds as a matter of law that a water ski kite is a “device for aerial navigation” based on two “critical” factors: (1) the aerodynamic principles which affect its ability to become and remain airborne, and (2) the degree of control which the operator has over its direction, speed, and the timing and place of landing.

I cannot agree that the exclusionary clause should be interpreted so broadly. A snow ski jumper’s skis during a jump comply with the “critical” factors outlined by the majority. Yet common sense clearly suggests that they are not devices for…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thompson v. EzzellWashington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Brinkmann v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Aetna Insurance v. CameronMontana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Clark v. Lone Star Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Cabell v. World Service Life Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API