Colbaugh v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FARIS, District Judge.
Defendant, sentenced to the penitentiary for two years and to pay a fine of $300 on his conviction for possessing whisky in an Indian country, sued out this writ of error to reverse such conviction.
The only error properly preserved, or seriously relied on, is that the evidence was insufficient to show defendant’s guilt. Counsel for the government rather vaguely suggests that such error cannot be urged or relied on, because it was not properly preserved in the trial court. The record on which this suggestion is bottomed is against the government. At the close of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Grantello v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1924
- Siden v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- State v. MunsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1922
- People v. NinehouseMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
- Brazeale v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1923
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Spalitto v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co. of Zurich v. FlickingerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Calvaresi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1954
- People v. SpannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Sanders v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1943
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.