Legal Opinion

(PS) Engel v. Cantil-Sakauye

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 24, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00893Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. No. 2:20-cv-0893-JAM-JDP (PS) JULIUS M. ENGEL, 12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14 TANI CANTIL-SAKAUYE, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On August 16, 2021, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on the parties and which contained notice that any objections to the findings 19 and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. No objections were filed. 20 The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Arthur Robbins, III v. Tom L. CareyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Langsenkamp v. Broscalsa Chemical Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API