Legal Opinion

Coffman v. Walton

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided May 30, 1892PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from the Cass Circ%át Cowrt. — Hon. Chas. W. . Sloan, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, J.

— This is an action of replevin, which being decided below for defendant on trial without a jury, plaintiff appeals.

One Darr gave to plaintiff a chattel mortgage on some cattle to secure a note of $730, Darr remaining in possession. Darr afterwards sold the cattle to defendant, and plaintiff instituted this action of replevin and depends upon his mortgage to sustain him. Defendant bought the cattle without actual knowledge of the mortgage; it was, however, duly recorded. Defendant’s defense is that plaintiff authorized Darr, generally, to sell the cattle, and that after the sale was made to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pratt v. MaynardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1874
  2. Gwin v. SmurMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Walser v. WearSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  2. Springfield Engine & Thresher Co. v. DonovanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  3. Barkley v. Barkley Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  4. Stockyards National Bank v. B. Harris Wool Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  5. Rogers v. DavisMissouri Court of Appeals · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API