Legal Opinion
Nicholson v. WINDHAM
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided September 18, 2002No. A02A0948PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Ruffin, Presiding Judge.
Donna Nicholson sued the law firm of Windham & Sauls, P.C., three lawyers at the firm, and five other employees (collectively “defendants”) for allegedly violating Georgia’s Racketeer Influenced & Corrupt Organizations (“RICO”) Act, 1 conspiracy to violate the RICO Act, aiding and abetting the violation of the RICO Act, tortious interference with contractual rights, civil conspiracy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, defamation, libel, and slander. The defendants moved to dismiss the complaint, asserting that Nicholson lacked standing to bring a civil…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Atlanta Market Center Management Co. v. McLaneSupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Yarbray v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1991
- Maddox v. Southern Engineering Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
- Morgan v. Guaranty National CompaniesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- First Federal Savings Bank v. HartCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Wylie v. DentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
- SCHOENBAUM LTD., LLC v. Lenox Pines, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- Saye v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
- Mindy Howerton v. Harbin ClinicCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Mayfield v. HeimanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.