Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baldwin-Woodville Area School District v. West Central Education Ass'n

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 2009No. 2008AP519Published

1DissentDavid T. Prosser, J.

¶ 39. {dissenting). The majority opinion reverses a unanimous court of appeals decision that vacated the arbitration award in this case. The majority concludes "that the arbitrator's construction of the [collective bargaining] agreement had a foundation in reason" and was therefore not a perverse misconstruction of the agreement. Majority op. ¶¶ 2, 38. I recognize and have no disagreement with the majority's explanation of the well-settled legal rules, principles, and standards that govern the judiciary's supervisory role in reviewing arbitration decisions. See id., ¶¶ 20-23. However, I…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City of Oshkosh v. Oshkosh Public Library Clerical & Maintenance Employees Union Local 796-AWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In THE MATTER OF ARBITRATION OF NICOLET HS DIST. v. Nicolet Ed. Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Police Ass'nWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against BarrockWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API