Legal Opinion

Ott v. Sprague

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1882PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error from Johnson District Court. Action for partition of certain lots in the city of Olathe, brought by Sprague against Ott. Trial at the November Term, 1881, of the district court, and judgment for plaintiff. Ótt brings the case here. The facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This was an action brought by Amy Sprague against C. M. Ott for the partition of lots numbers 6 and 9, in block 51, in the city of Olathe, Kansas. The plaintiff claimed to be the owner of one undivided one-half •of said lots, with the improvements thereon, while the defendant claimed to be the solé and exclusive' owner of the property. The case was tried in the court below by the court without a jury, upon an agreed statement of facts, and upon this agreed statement of facts the court below found in favor of the plaintiff and against the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chambers v. CoxSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  2. Carithers v. WeaverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  3. Simpson v. GreeleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Bruce v. LukeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  5. Scoffins v. GrandstaffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Pipkin v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
  2. Goldsborough v. HewittSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Whelan v. AdamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Bragdon v. McSheaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
  5. Howell, Jewett & Co. v. McCrieSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API