Legal Opinion
Sperry Rand Corp. v. Town of North Hempstead
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 2, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaniel G. Albert, J.
In this proceeding, pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR, petitioner seeks a judgment directing the respondents: (1) to provide full garbage and rubbish collection and disposal service for that portion of petitioner’s property which lies within the Albertson-Searington-Herricks Refuse and Garbage District (hereinafter referred to as the ‘1 District ’■’•)' in the Town of North Hempstead (hereinafter referred to as the . “Town”), and (2) to make restitution to petitioner of that portion of the special levy paid by it to the District for garbage and rubbish collection that is applicable to the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Weiskopf v. City of Saratoga SpringsNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Weiskopf v. City of Saratoga SpringsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
3Cited by16 opinions
- New York Telephone Co. v. Supervisor of Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
- Sperry Rand Corp. v. Town of North HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- Applebaum v. Town of Oyster BayNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Juleah Co. v. Incorporated Village of RoslynAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- Landmark Colony at Oyster Bay Homeowners' Ass'n v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.