Legal Opinion

Guadalupe v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 1, 2004No. AC 24180PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Eduardo Guadalupe, appeals following the denial by the habeas court of his petition for certification to appeal from the denial of his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court (1) abused its discretion when it denied his petition for certification to appeal, (2) improperly rejected his claim that trial counsel provided ineffective assistance and (3) improperly failed to inquire about the volrmtariness of his guilty plea, thereby violating his due process rights. Our examination of the record and briefs persuades us that the…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Simms v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  4. Simms v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
  5. Bunkley v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mercado v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
  2. Dontigney v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  3. Gonzalez v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
  4. Gallimore v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Romero v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API