Legal Opinion

H. G. Vogel Co. v. Reinhardt

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment of the City Court of the city of Hew York dismissing the complaint, and from an order denying motion for a new trial.

1Per curiam

On or about May 3,1911, the plaintiff made a contract in writing with the defendant for equipping defendant’s factory with a system of fire extinguishing apparatus at a cost of $1,133. 'The agreement provided that if plaintiff’s work should be discontinued by fire or other cause not the fault of the plaintiff, ‘ ‘ there shall become and be immediately due and payable from you [defendant] on account of the. work a sum equal to the value of the materials, labor' and services furnished at the date of such discontinuance.” It was also stipulated that title should remain in the plaintiff to the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dolan v. . RodgersNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  2. Butterfield v. ByronMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  3. Hayes v. GrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. F. M. Gabler, Inc. v. Evans Laboratories, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1927
  2. H. G. Vogel Co. v. ReinhardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API