Terrill v. Schultz

Defendants appeal from denial of their motion for new trial after plaintiff had filed a remittitur in the amount of interest included in a jury verdict. The suit was on the common counts for work done and materials furnished by plaintiff, an interior decorator. Defendants, by claim of set-off and recoupment, sought judgment against plaintiff for defective work and excess payments made. The jury’s verdict was for the full amount of plaintiff’s claim plus the interest remitted.

Each error urged upon the trial judge in defendants’ motion for new trial is included in the statement of questions…