McKeegan v. Ernst
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtHazouri, J.
Appellant, Rita McKeegan, appeals the trial court’s entry of an ex parte temporary injunction granted by the trial court. She argues that the temporary injunction is facially deficient because it fails to include sufficient factual findings to support each prong of the four-part injunction test. We agree.
“A party seeking a temporary injunction must prove: (1) that it will suffer irreparable harm unless the status quo is maintained; (2) that it has no adequate remedy at law; (3) that it has a substantial likelihood of success on the merits; (4) that a temporary injunction will serve the public…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- FLA. HIGH SCHOOL ACTIVITIES v. BenitezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
- Bookall v. Sunbelt Rentals, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008
- Jouvence Center for Advanced Health, LLC v. Jouvence Rejuvenation Centers, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
- Wade v. BrownDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3Cited by6 opinions
- American Learning Systems, Inc. v. GomesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
- RONALD N. DUBNER v. FRANK FERRARODistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2018
- COMPOUNDING DOCS, INC. v. SCSC ENTERPRISES, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- MICHAEL HAYES AND DEBRA FERRAGAMO-HAYES v. MONROE COUNTY, FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- MICHAEL MAYS, KALA HENNESSEY, and MGM RESTORATION, LLC v. JOE TAYLOR RESTORATION, INC.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.